Comparison of the courses in Italy and London

I am fortunate to have had the opportunity to teach at courses organised by the summer school in Italy and the Cancer Survival Group at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine each summer for more than a decade. Each of the courses has evolved each year and I have improved my knowledge through interaction with both participants and co-teachers. Potential participants occasionally ask me about the differences between the the courses. Following is my assessment of the differences between the two courses, so that potential participants may make an informed decision as to which course suits them best (assuming resources do not allow attending both).

The courses cover similar content, but different aspects are emphasized due to the different backgrounds and experience of the teachers. The course in Italy is taught by Paul Lambert and myself, who are statisticians, so we focus more on statistical methods. The course in London also covers the statistical methods, but not to the same extent. The cancer survival group in London are world-leading in international comparisons of cancer patient survival so their course devotes more time to specific features of the analysis and interpretation of such studies (including data quality and quality control, choice of method, analytic approach, intepretation, and impact on policy). Paul Lambert and I discuss the role of cancer survival research in policy, but do not have the experience of Michel Coleman who delivers two lectures on this topic during the London course. I should also note that the London group are also internationally recognised for their research in developing methods for the analysis of cancer patient survival and they recruit visiting faculty who are recognoised as the formost experts in the area (e.g., maja Pohar Perme and Jacques Estève).

In summary, the Italy course devotes more time to the statistical methods. Paul Lambert and I work more in clinical cancer epidemiology and our course devotes more time to methods and applications in clinical epidemiology whereas the London group focus more on descriptive epidemiology and devote more time there. The Italy course devotes considerably more time to statistical modelling, especially the theory and application of flexible parametric models. There is broad knowledge among both faculties, but we have different areas of specific expertise.

The teaching styles are somewhat different. The London course is more structured, with a greater number of teachers who are each allocated a fixed amount of time. The Italy course is less structured and more student-focussed. Lectures are planned in advance, but the schedule is flexible with the pace and content tailored to the audience. The style of the computer labs are very different; the aim in London is that all participants complete the same exercises whereas in Italy the focus in on providing tailored exercises and one-on-one help to suit each participant’s interests.

Paul Dickman
Paul Dickman
Professor of Biostatistics

Biostatistician working with register-based cancer epidemiology.

Related